May 15, 2009 Bookmark and Share
"Back Off? No Way."
Rebecca Sive | 2:37 PM | Blog Post
Here is a note I just received, with a request to sign a petition.




________________________________________________________
Dear Friend,

We had been debating whether it was necessary to join the ever-growing chorus calling on President Obama to appoint a woman to replace Supreme Court Justice David Souter – until White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told us not to.

“I don’t think that the lobbying of interest groups will help,” Gibbs said this week, according to Politico. “I think in many ways lobbying can – and will – be counterproductive.”

What? Why would it be “counterproductive” to remind the President, the nation, and the world, that it is unacceptable to have only one woman serving on the Supreme Court? Why would it be “counterproductive” to point out that women are 51 percent of the population, 49 percent of law school graduates, 32 percent of the legal profession – but only 11 percent of the Supreme Court?

How is it “counterproductive” to note that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg herself describes being the only woman on the court as “lonely”?

Was it “counterproductive” when Sens. Barbara Boxer and Olympia Snowe sent a bipartisan letter to the President on Monday asking him to select a woman to replace Souter? “In order for the court to be relevant, it needs to be diverse and better reflect America,” the Senators wrote.

It is not counterproductive. It is our right and our responsibility to stand up and speak out about evidence of the inequality on the Court. Call on President Obama to name a woman to the Supreme Court .

Justice Ginsburg herself has said that women bring a different perspective to the bench and their life experiences influence their judgment. One woman representing 11 percent of the Court should not have the burden of reflecting the perspective and judgment of 51 percent of the population.

We join with Sens. Boxer and Snowe. We join with the op-eds, interviews, commentary, and petition drives calling on the President to name a woman to the Court. Add your voice to the chorus calling on President Obama to name a woman on the Supreme Court . We can’t say it loudly enough.

Sincerely,

The WomenCount Team
http://www.womencount.org/




________________________________________________________








Rebecca Sive

Labels: , , ,

Grrrl Power: Jan, Valerie, Tina, Amy and 1900 "Grrrlfriends"
Rebecca Sive | 10:20 AM | Blog Post
Monday was Jan Schakowsky's (D.,IL, U.S. House of Representatives, www.janschakowsky.org) annual "Power Lunch," in today's lingo, a real "grrrl power" gathering.

Equally importantly, it was a truly joyous opportunity for Jan's legions of fans to thank her for being such a great leader of women.

This year, Jan's featured speakers were "girlfriends" Valerie Jarrett and Tina Tchen, talking about life and work in the White House for our (maybe-not-the-first; see below) feminist President.

Both Valerie and Tina were eloquent, funny, informative and inspirational. Knowing them, I expected nothing less, but it was particularly inspiring when Valerie closed by inviting all of us to think about new ways to be of service in this time of great need.[Keep reading, and you'll see why Valerie's comments were so apt on this particular day.]

Another guest of Jan's was U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D.,MN, www.amyklobuchar.com), a girlfriend of mine since her law school years here in Chicago with my husband. I was so pleased to invite Amy to join Jan's celebration this year--when so much that is so wonderful, for women all over the world, has been made possible by the women of Chicago. I think Amy confirmed her understanding of this when she said: "Thanks for giving (the rest of) us Michelle Obama's husband."

This great day began on an inspirational note, when I read the do-not-miss column below about one of our great, great grandmothers, who also worked in the White House. As I read, I realized that, but for the courage she displayed, over 75 years ago, we might not have been able to celebrate quite so gloriously at our lunch.

Here is the article from womensenews.org

New Deal Began With Her, That Chilly Night in 1933
By Kirstin Downey, WeNews correspondent


(WOMENSENEWS)--"On a chilly February night in 1933, a middle-aged woman waited expectantly to meet with her employer at his residence on East 65th Street in New York City. She clutched a scrap of paper with hastily written notes. Finally ushered into his study, the woman brushed aside her nervousness and spoke confidently. They bantered casually for a while, as was their style, then she turned serious, her dark, luminous eyes holding his gaze.

"He wanted her to take an assignment but she had decided she wouldn't accept it unless he allowed her to do it her own way. She held up the piece of paper in her hand, and he motioned for her to continue.

"She ticked off the items: a 40-hour work week, a minimum wage, worker's compensation, unemployment compensation, a federal law banning child labor, direct federal aid for unemployment relief, Social Security, a revitalized public employment service and health insurance. She watched his eyes to make sure he was paying attention and understood the implications of each demand. She braced for his response, knowing that he often chose political expediency over idealism and was capable of callousness, even cruelty.

"The scope of her list was breathtaking. She was proposing a fundamental and radical restructuring of American society, with enactment of historic social welfare and labor laws. To succeed, she would have to overcome opposition from the courts, business, labor unions, conservatives.

"'Nothing Like This Before'

"'Nothing like this has ever been done in the United States before,'she said. You know that, don't you?'

"The man sat across from her in his wheelchair amid the clutter of boxes and rumpled rugs. Soon, he would head to Washington, D.C., to be sworn in as the 32nd president of the United States. He would inherit the worst economic crisis in the nation's history. An era of rampant speculation had come to an end. The stock market had collapsed, rendering investments valueless. Banks were shutting down, stripping people of their lifetime savings. About a third of workers were unemployed; wages were falling; tens of thousands were homeless. Real estate prices had plummeted and millions of homeowners faced foreclosure.


"His choice of labor secretary would be one of his most important early decisions. His nominee must understand economic and employment issues, but be equally effective as a coalition builder.

"He was a handsome man, with aquiline features, and he studied the plain, matronly woman sitting before him. No one was more qualified for the job. She knew as much about labor law and administration as anyone in the country. He'd known her for more than 20 years, the last four in Albany, where she had worked at his side. He trusted her and knew she would never betray him.

"But placing a woman in the labor secretary's job would expose him to criticism and ridicule. Her list of proposals would stir heated opposition, even among his loyal supporters. The eight-hour day was a standard plank of the Socialist Party; unemployment insurance seemed laughably improbable; direct aid to the unemployed would threaten his campaign pledge of a balanced budget.

"He said he would back her.

"Life-Long Preparation

"It was a job she had prepared for all her life. She had changed her name, her appearance, even her stated age to make herself a more effective labor advocate. She had studied how men think so she could better succeed in a man's world. She had spent decades building crucial alliances.

"Still, she told the president-elect that she needed time to make her decision. The next day she visited her husband, a patient in a sanitarium. He was having a good day and he understood when she told him about the job offer. His first impulse was to fret for himself, asking her how this new job might affect him. When she assured him that he could remain where he was and that her weekend visits would continue, he gave his permission.

"That night in bed, the woman cried in deep, wailing sobs that frightened her teenage daughter. She knew the job would change her life forever. She would open herself to constant media scrutiny, harsh judgment from her peers and public criticism for doing a job a woman had never done before. Yet she knew she must accept the offer. As her grandmother had told her, whenever a door opened to you, you had no choice but to walk through it.

"The next day she called Franklin Roosevelt and accepted the offer.

"Frances Perkins would become the nation's first female secretary of labor."

Kirstin Downey is the author of a new book, "The Life of Frances Perkins, FDR's Secretary of Labor and His Moral Conscience, The Woman Behind the New Deal," Nan A. Talese/Doubleday, 2009. She was formerly a staff writer at the Washington Post, covering economics and workplace issues.

Rebecca

Labels: , , , , , ,

May 8, 2009 Bookmark and Share
"A Woman's Nation," Take Two: Philanthropy's (Community) Organizing Rules, for Well-behaved Women Rarely Make History
Rebecca Sive | 12:00 PM | Blog Post
In a recent column, Gara LaMarche, the head of The Atlantic Philanthropies, ("dedicated to bringing about lasting changes in the lives of disadvantaged and vulnerable people," www.atlanticphilanthropies.org), discussed a visit with Dick Boone.

Dick was the last director of the Field Foundation, but one of the first foundation directors to make social change a criterion for his grantmaking. Indeed, Mr. LaMarche noted that Dick was a mentor to many of us active today in promoting social justice and equal rights.

Whether as foundation executives, fundraisers, organizational or business executives, or civic leaders--and in large part due to Dick's tutelage--many of Dick's students seek to mobilize today's philanthropy to advance social justice and equality.

Mr. LaMarche observed that Dick began his social justice work in the South-side-Chicago Woodlawn neighborhood, under the tutelage of Saul Alinsky. Yes, it was on the South Side of Chicago that Dick (also) learned the principles of community organizing.

Below, I've listed some of those principles because I think they are applicable to building Maria Shriver's "woman's nation," a task for philanthropy too.

You'll note that many of these "rules for radicals," as Alinsky termed them, echo an old feminist saw: "Well-behaved women rarely make history." And, yes, I'm betting that in their private moments, if not in their public ones, Maria, Condi, Hillary, and, yes, even Michelle, would witness to this truth. And it's a good thing for the rest of us that they can.

Here are these rules of engagement:

1) Power is not only what you have, but what [others] think you have.
2) Never go outside the experience of your people (your constituents, whether actual because you are a public official, or metaphorical because you are otherwise a leader).
3) Wherever possible, go outside of the experience of the [opposition].
4) Make the [opposition] live up to [its] own book of rules.
5) Keep the pressure on.
6) The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
7) Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.


Rebecca

Labels: , , , , , , ,